<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing RED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardmassey.tv/2009/seeing-red/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardmassey.tv/2009/seeing-red/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:54:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joey Parr</title>
		<link>http://www.richardmassey.tv/2009/seeing-red/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardmassey.tv/?p=693#comment-169</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bulky and heavy without the dressings, making it almost impossible to handheld. It attempts to put the amateur and professional on the same playing ground, and to a certain extent, that is what it does. But I have not seen extensively impressive rigs used by any of the independents. What I have seen is sloppier lighting design compensated by overbearing post color-correction. This makes everyone feel like they are shooting Amelie.

People get a little too caught up in image and forget that its worthless without and good story and even then, cinematography and composition only serve to buttress the narrative. Self-conscious photography proves nothing to an audience. It only pleases the behind-the-scenes amateur.

What has really impressed me is the Canon 5D Mark II 25p. Everything I&#039;ve seen on vimeo from that hardware looks terrific. It smaller, very good for documentary, I would say, and pending a external sound mixer, one might have a fancy-looking piece of film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bulky and heavy without the dressings, making it almost impossible to handheld. It attempts to put the amateur and professional on the same playing ground, and to a certain extent, that is what it does. But I have not seen extensively impressive rigs used by any of the independents. What I have seen is sloppier lighting design compensated by overbearing post color-correction. This makes everyone feel like they are shooting Amelie.</p>
<p>People get a little too caught up in image and forget that its worthless without and good story and even then, cinematography and composition only serve to buttress the narrative. Self-conscious photography proves nothing to an audience. It only pleases the behind-the-scenes amateur.</p>
<p>What has really impressed me is the Canon 5D Mark II 25p. Everything I&#8217;ve seen on vimeo from that hardware looks terrific. It smaller, very good for documentary, I would say, and pending a external sound mixer, one might have a fancy-looking piece of film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
